Monday, June 23, 2014

My Thoughts on Kate Kelly and "Ordain Women"

I have recently been reading up on the information surrounding the excommunication of Kate Kelly for her work in forming the organization “Ordain Women”, which was organized to recruit other women who want to see females given the authority to hold priesthood keys in the LDS church.  I’m seriously saddened by the fact that she even started the organization.  My heart goes out to her for the decision made by the church to in fact excommunicate her for apostasy.  To be very clear, however, and some may see this as harsh, I think the church made the right decision. 

Kate Kelly cites her reason for bringing this issue to such public light is a lack of gender equality in the church.  She also professes to be a faithful member of the church.  I do not believe that her actions in creating the group are consistent with being a faithful member of the church.

First of all, on gender equality - the term equality is loosely fitted to gender issues in all cultures of the free world in order to make the same opportunities available to women as men.  As a woman with a strong personality and variety of abilities that might not be considered necessarily “womanly”, I’m a HUGE proponent of women being considered capable, strong, intellectually, and in some cases physically, equal beings when standing aside men.  I DO NOT, however, believe that the LDS doctrine that men, and only men, being allowed to be ordained to the priesthood is a gender equality issue that falls in this same category.

The church does not separate men and women because of a lack of equality in rights and opportunities.  The doctrine of the gospel of Jesus Christ actually praises and lifts up women for their natural and spiritually inherent DIFFERENCES from men.  And that is NOT a ploy to keep women complacent in the church, as some may have come to believe.  It is true.  Women are cherished, cared for, and lovingly led by righteous men in the LDS church. 

Personally, I embrace my identity as a woman and the strengths and positive attributes that come with that.  Men’s strengths and positive attributes are DIFFERENT than those of women, and those difference should be highlighted and praised on their own merit.  I don’t feel that I need the keys of the priesthood, mostly because I already have the ability to call on priesthood power when needed. 

I, like Kate Kelly, have been married in an LDS temple.  With that ordinance, and my promises to the Lord to be faithful, I have been promised blessings and powers in the priesthood.  Kate Kelly has also said she has been married in the temple, which means that she has the opportunity to understand that her power in the priesthood does not have to be the use of the keys of the priesthood, offered only to men in mortality.  She has (or had) priesthood power of her own, she just could not hold priesthood office in the Lord’s church. 

Lastly, what Kate fails to realize, notwithstanding her lifelong membership, is that the church will not ever change its policy for holding priesthood keys in this mortality unless revealed by Jesus Christ to the current prophet to do so.  I think she was correctly directed to keep these issues between herself and her local ward and stake leadership and to further her personal study and prayer for better understanding of the doctrine.  Prayer is a beautiful tool of the Lord where we can offer him up the desires of our hearts – even understanding of things we don’t agree with or things we wish would be changed.  She could even pray for the eventual change in church organization, but a petition to the first presidency is not how the Lord makes changes in His church, no matter how many of its members sign it.  Those kinds of changes come through direct revelation to the prophet, who holds all priesthood keys available to His children in mortality. 

As a woman in the LDS church, I am content with my purposes and powers as a daughter of God.  Like I said, my heart goes out to Kate Kelly for choosing to spread her ideas in a manner which leads others away from the doctrines of the church, and which ultimately cost her her membership in that church.  As someone who considers myself faithful in the church, I would find it personally devastating to be excommunicated for reasons that I didn't understand.  While her personal views were that of someone simply starting a dialogue, I think she missed the fact that she started much more than that among her recruits – people that she rallied behind her who believe that the church is wrong in following the doctrine that men only are to be ordained to the priesthood. 

I feel so blessed to understand my strength and power as a woman – which is equal in value, but not in name to that of the men of the church.  That understanding has been a long time coming through my own study and thoughtful prayer and meditation.  Unfortunately, there are no perfect Christians on this earth today.  Fortunately, we have been promised by the Lord that we will not be led astray by his prophets – or rather, the prophets will not be allowed to direct us in paths that are not His.  I also feel blessed to have the faith that this truth will hold, and that if changes are to be made, they will be revealed and made in the Lord’s time.  Who am I to hurry the Lord?

~An End.


PS – non-PC sidenote:  It can be a little disheartening to feel like saying the words “I’m a Mormon” might not hold the same kind of weight I feel it should for myself and others.  Being a Mormon, because the doctrines are clear, should mean that we live a congruous life-style.  While we are individuals with different personalities, talents and desires, it should still mean that we share core beliefs and celebrate the same truths.  This incident, and others like it, makes me feel like we might end up splitting ourselves into different levels of true faithfulness.  Like Jews versus Orthodox Jews, or Catholics versus “devout” Catholics.  Heaven knows there are a thousand ways to call yourself a Christian.  Are there going to be “devout” Mormons and just Mormons, or “mostly” Mormons?  Kate Kelly makes me feel like it might be inevitable.

2 comments:

  1. I have to say, I feel quite confused about Kate Kelly. My heart goes out to her. I know that she truly believes in the priesthood and it's power here and in the eternities. However, if she claims to believe that the church is true, it would mean accepting the way it receives revelation. Throughout the argument of ordained women, Kelly picked bits and pieces out from church history and scriptures to try and make her argument. We've already established that I am not a believer and this means I don't believe in the priesthood, but I am not going to go out and try and convince everyone why I think the priesthood isn't real, because (and let me know if I confused you) I believe it is very real for the people that choose to believe it. I believe everyone has the power of God within them and that we can tap in and harness it. This idea of priesthood is just one way for a group of people to do that. I agree that it doesn't matter how many people sign a petition or march on temple square. The church has never really been a democracy. How can someone claim to believe in the church, which means supporting that the Prophet receives revelation on behalf of the church as a whole, but try to fundamentally change something that has already been denied by the prophet or as the church members see it, Jesus? It's just all really confusing to me. I am not sure I am articulating myself well. So we can definitely continue this conversation and I can clarify.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you're articulating yourself perfectly well. I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks it strange that she considers herself faithful and thinks that trying to petition the first presidency would work. This totally aside from the fact that she doesn't seem to understand the doctrines of the priesthood well herself. I always love to hear your thoughts!!

      Delete

As this blog is read by a wide variety of people, please use appropriate language. Thanks!